Home
Current Issue
Archives
Links
About Us
Ad Rates
The Columbia Journal
P.O. Box 2633 MPO,
Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada V6B 3W8
Phone: 604-266-6552
Fax: 604-267-3342
Web: www.columbiajournal.ca

|
|
Books:
Woodsquat
Aaron Vidaver, editor
West Coast Line
Volume 37- no. 2-3
2003-2004
$12.00
Tom Sandborn
“The laws, in their infinite majesty, forbid both the rich and the poor
to sleep beneath the bridges of Paris,” observed a sardonic French
writer during the 19th century. Not too much has changed in the
intervening years. Capitalism still creates agonizing poverty at the
bottom, excess wealth at the top, and a “justice” system designed to
keep the aromatic, unsightly poor from bothering their social betters.
Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside neighborhood has served, almost since the
beginning of European settlement here in the rain forest, as a holding
pen for surplus labour and the marginalized poor who have fallen into
capitalism’s spare parts bin. The neighborhood is, famously, Canada’s
poorest and the home of one of the country’s largest concentrations of
off-reserve native settlements.
It has been ground zero in the last decade for an epidemic of injection
drug use and HIV/AIDS infection, and has seen a nightmarish level of
violence against women--violence that has often targeted the sex trade
workers who have been pushed, mortally vulnerable, onto its darkest
street corners by a combination of police harassment and drug
addiction.
In 2002, all through a rainy fall, a loose coalition of Downtown
Eastside residents and supporters from the broader left in the Lower
Mainland conducted an occupation of the old Woodwards building and then
its surrounding sidewalks. The squatters called on the provincial
Liberals and the city to protect the social housing component that had
been promised for when the old department store building, a long time
neighborhood landmark, was re-developed.
The squat began dramatically in September, with a SWAT team of
activists swarming up ladders to break into the Woodwards building and
announcing that they were there to stay until the various levels of
government took effective action to address the housing crisis in
Vancouver. The four-month drama that then unfolded included middle of
the night raids by the riot squad, arrests, negotiations and political
tumult. By the time the last squatters were swept off the streets
around Woodward just before the Christmas season, the Woodwards Squat
had become a symbol of housing and anti-poverty resistance known across
the country, and may well have played a role in the sweeping victory of
the Coalition of Progressive Electors in that fall’s civic election.
Voters turned in landslide numbers to the more or less progressive COPE
slate to express the crisis of civic conscience about the firestorm of
homelessness and disease sweeping through the city’s old skid row
neighborhood, a rolling and lethal crisis the Woodsquat had put front
and center on the public agenda.
The squat ended inconclusively, with the squatters moved out of their
encampment in the public eye and into back street hotels run by social
service agencies close to the new city government, but without the
dramatic increase in social housing and other anti-poverty initiatives
that the squatters had demanded.
So what did it all mean? Was Woodsquat another moment in
Vancouver’s long and honourable history of direct action on poverty and
housing issues, an energetic successor to actions taken by the WW II
vets who occupied the Hotel Vancouver after the war to win themselves
decent housing, or the street- punk/anarchist action in 1990 that
turned a row of abandoned houses on Frances Street into a long running
and high profile squat?
Was the Woodsquat a victory for popular resistance, or another unhappy
lesson in the dangers of trusting middle class civic reformers, a
debacle that allowed “poverty pimps” and politicians a few minutes of
cheap publicity and revenue opportunity before the folks at the bottom
were abandoned once again to die in the back alleys?
The debates that swirled around the Woodwards occupation during its
lifespan will no doubt continue for as long as homelessness and poverty
stalk the mean streets of the city, and Aaron Vidaver’s new collection
of oral history and analytic articles on the Woodwards events will be
an invaluable resource for historians, anti poverty activists and
concerned citizens for as long as that debate continues.
Readers of this fierce, committed piece of editorial work will not look
to it for journalistic “objectivity.” This is a book with a clear and
partisan point of view. Like many of the contributors to this
collection, the editor is deeply angry about the abysmal conditions of
life for the marginalized poor in Canada, and committed to major social
change to re-structure a fundamentally cannibal economy and political
system that serves the interests of the business class at the top while
consigning many to death and despair at the bottom.
This useful and informative collection concentrates upon the
testimonies of Woodwards occupiers and their supporters, and allows
them to tell their stories with all their tangled contradictions and
tensions, while occasionally including police and bureaucratic
documents that provide fascinating glimpses of life on the other side
of the enforcement lines that divide the managed from their managers
Vidaver and the other activists and academics associated with West
Coast Line have been admirably unwilling to drown out the voices from
the street with over-arching discourses from the academy, or to edit
out elements that cast the squatters in less than romantic
revolutionary terms. We hear, for example, often in Woodsquat about the
dealers, the damaged and the thugs who became part of the scene around
the squat, and about angry splits within the squat community, fired by
suspicions that money donated to support the occupation was ending up
in private pockets.
This level of unsentimental honesty is to be saluted in the editors,
and, in the end, makes Woodsquat an even more compelling read and
valuable social document than it would have been had the editing
process been driven by ideology alone. This book is a must read for
anyone concerned with social justice in Canada or with Vancouver
history. We are all in debt to Aaron Vidaver, his colleagues, and, most
important, the brave and desperate activists who made the Woodsquat
occupation possible, and helped create this vital book that documents
an important moment in Canadian history.
|
|
|
|
|
|