Communities Consider Co-ops as
Alternatives to Health Privatization
Hospital closures,
privatization and dwindling health care services have left many British
Columbians searching for better ways of delivering accessible, quality
health care.
But for some communities,
in both the Interior and the Lower Mainland, the cooperative model is
providing an alternative both to the status quo and to the
privatization “solution.”
So far, the
municipalities of Surrey, Nelson, Sparwood,
Kimberly, Sooke, and Vernon have incorporated
community cooperative ventures to replace hospitals, clinics and
long-term care facilities being closed by the Liberal government as it
restructures the health care system for corporate take-over. Other
communities, such as Enderby at the North end of Okanagan Lake, are also looking to set
up similar enterprises in an effort to keep health services free from
commercial profit demands and under community control.
“It’s all about control,”
said Dee Wejr, chair of the citizens’ steering committee in Enderby
made up of local residents and laid off health care workers. “In the
past we have had services brought into the community only to have them
disappear later on. We want to be able to decide what we need and what
we don’t need.”
The co-op plan includes
holistic, Western, First Nations traditional and alternative methods of
health care treatment. The services fell into four categories: health
and medical services; living places, such as supportive living programs
and projects; learning (health and wellness), and leadership and
development. The proposed services also include things like intravenous
therapy, extended and palliative care, health workshops and counseling.
“It’s been our feeling
for a long time that the writing is on the wall across Canada in terms
of the medical system and I think it’s very important for local people
to start taking charge of their own destiny,” said Mayor Gordon Dale,
who strongly supports the new co-op model for health services. “The
idea has struck a chord in the community. People are eager to regain
control of the type and quality of health care they rely on.”
But communities like
Surrey, Sparwood, and in particular Nelson, are even further ahead in
developing such ventures, according to John Restakis, executive
director of the BC Cooperative Association, which has been providing
expertise in setting up these enterprises.
“The city of Nelson set up the Community
First Health Co-operative after their hospital was shut down, and now
it has 1100 members,” he said. “They recently put in a bid to operate a
long-term care facility in their community. But despite a really
credible business plan, and overwhelming community support, they
weren’t even short-listed.”
The bid went to a large
for-profit corporation, as have most of the contracts let out by the
government. Although he is not certain, he suspects the government
refused the bid because of its dedication to the corporate take-over of
the health care system. That means avoiding community-based enterprises.
Nonetheless, Restakis
says this set back has not dampened the enthusiasm for the venture, and
the cooperative, with the support of local businesses, health care
unions and the Nelson and district Credit Union, is developing
fundraising and capitalization plans.
He adds a similar
development in Sparwood, where local residents together with the BC
Nurses Union and CUPE have set up a co-op, has recently gained the
support of the city council, which has invested funds to hire and
coordinator to develop a walk-in community health clinic.
Meanwhile, in Surrey, the
newly established Rainbow Health Co-op already has a clinic set up and
is offering counseling services to the region’s large Indo-Canadian
community—one of the few services in the area to do so.
From their point of view,
a growing number of communities have come to feel that real health
reform may have less to do with money and politics, and more to do with
local control and ensuring that health systems are responsive and
directly accountable to those who use them.