Three Part Series on
the Corporate Take-over of Our Social Services
Corporate
Trade in Welfare
Part
2: Suppression of the Facts
William Proulx
The BC Liberals have been
touting their new JobWave program as an example of successful
public-private partnership, or much vaunted P3, the latest buzzword
used to describe those for-profit companies managing government
projects or delivering government services. Allegedly this is saving
government money, although in reality it is at best redistribution from
many pockets to few.
The rationale is that the
program is self-funding because the companies are paid out of the money
the government saves every time a person or family stops receiving
welfare. The assumption is that everyone who gets a job through the
program would have been on welfare for a full 19 months, usually not
the case, especially given JobWave and Destinations’ admitted practice
of taking only the most employable referrals. This means they don’t
take people who might have addictions, or social barriers such as
mental illness, or even poor hygiene.
The reality is that one of
these private programs alone sucked almost $24 million from the
government teat in the last year alone. The reality is that the only
definition of success is if the client does not return to the welfare
rolls. Following this rationale a person who moves out of province
would be considered “placed,” because they would no longer be receiving
income assistance in BC, as would a person who went back to the welfare
office, didn’t meet eligibility requirements, and ended up homeless, or
dead.
Of course it is in the best interest of
the BC Liberals to have this program succeed. Human Resources Minister Murray Coell and his
cabinet colleagues have repeatedly defended the government’s tightening
of welfare requirements by saying there are jobs available, citing as
evidence the number of postings held by JobWave and friends, repeatedly
making the simplistic statement that “a job is the best security” for
all British Columbians. This orientation towards success is evidenced
by the contents of the contracts the agencies have signed with the
province.
The programs are required to
refer participants back to the government if they “have been
unsuccessful in achieving a placement during the 90 days of
pre-employment services” or if they “have advised the contractor that
they do not wish to participate in the Program” (usually the kiss of
death for further welfare benefits). The clients must then commit
completely to the contractor for 19 months to the exclusion of other
normally available programs through HRDC or any of several non-profit
social agencies.
The end result of this
policy has meant that the other non-profit agencies who have provided
both training and employment services in the past are now in the
position of having to operate solely with those clients the corporate
agencies have rejected as unsuitable, meaning they may be difficult to
place. Added to this is a requirement to accept performance-based
funding dependant on people finding jobs. This introduces an incentive
to work only with the easiest to help, resulting in a paradigm shift
from providing much needed social services to survival based upon
capitalizing on people finding work, any work at all.
There has been criticism of
the brave new course the BC Liberals have charted into the familiar
waters of the capitalist cash flow. The president of ASPECT was
particularly vocal about how the Job Wave contract was awarded, being
quoted in newspapers throughout the province. As a result of this media
coverage the parent corporation West Coast Group won a 2001 court order
that silenced criticism. The order prohibited ASPECT representatives
from “libeling or slandering the Plaintiffs.” In other words ASPECT was
quickly subjected to a SLAPP suit and its opposition silenced. Of
course any possibility of a counter suit by ASPECT was ended through
the simple means of awarding them a small slice of the pie.
Not everyone is overly
critical of the Job Wave/Destinations model. The Fraser Institute (no
surprise here) is a huge fan of the government’s approach. Its report
card on BC welfare reform for 2002 praises Job Wave stating; “The use
of private sector providers and their particular competencies in
delivering welfare and welfare-related services represents an enormous
step forward in social policy in Canada and should be expanded, both in
British Columbia and throughout Canada.” There is currently a move to
expand these programs into Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Nova Scotia. No doubt the scent of easy
money will cause more corporate sharks to circle provincial welfare
agencies across the country.